Fusion Twin: Designing a Scientific Simulation Platform

Simplifying file management, simulation setup, and scientific data exploration for fusion researchers.

Year

2024-2025

Role

Founding Product Designer

Team & Collaboration

I worked in a cross-functional team of around six people: a Product Manager, CEO, Full-Stack Developer, QA Engineer, and two Backend Developers. Product priorities were primarily defined by the Product Manager.

Overview

Challenge

Researchers worked across disconnected files, parameters, and specialist tools, making simulation setup and data exploration difficult to follow.

My role

As the Founding Product Designer, I translated technical requirements into the product structure, core workflows, and reusable interface patterns.

Solution

I designed a unified workspace for managing files, configuring simulations, tracking status, and exploring scientific results.

Outcome

The product established a scalable foundation for researcher workflows and supported demonstrations to scientific and business stakeholders.

Key Achievements

• Gold Winner — Vega Digital Awards 2024 (Science & Technology).
‍• Bronze Winner — Summit International Awards 2025.
• Strategic Funding Catalyst: Designed a professional-grade interface that helped secure key R&D funding by demonstrating commercial scalability in a $10B+ market.

Understanding the Scientific Workflow

Researchers moved repeatedly between datasets, simulation settings, status tracking, and analytical results. I mapped this workflow to identify where the product needed clearer structure and feedback.

The product needed to simplify the workflow without simplifying the science.

Research & Key Insights

Research at a glance

5

expert interviews

6

workflows reviewed

4

core product areas

3

major iterations

Key Insights

Fragmented context

Files, parameters, and simulation states were spread across separate tools and views.

High setup complexity

Configuration errors could interrupt the workflow or require repeated work.

Expert users needed density

Researchers valued compact, precise information more than simplified consumer-style interfaces.

Relationships mattered more than isolated values

Users needed to understand how parameters, files, and outcomes were connected.

Users & Workflow

Research revealed two user profiles with different levels of expertise but a shared need for clearer setup, reliable feedback, and understandable results.

How they move through the product

The storyboard helped align the team around the core researcher journey and identify where users needed clearer guidance, system feedback, and continuity between steps.

Information Architecture & Prioritization

I structured the product around the objects researchers worked with most frequently: projects, files, simulations, scenarios, graphs, and analytical notebooks.

Prioritization matrix

For the first release, I prioritised the workflows that formed the foundation of every scientific task.

Exploring the Core Workflows

I used wireframes to validate the structure of the most complex workflows before moving into high-fidelity design.

Early wireframes helped validate hierarchy, parameter grouping, and system feedback before moving into high fidelity.

Core Solutions

01. Unified Workspace

I designed a responsive workspace that brought uploaded files, saved outputs, graphs, and digital twins into one clear starting point.
Researchers could quickly switch workspaces and access the tools relevant to their current project across desktop and mobile.

02. File Management

I designed a central workspace where researchers could upload, organise, inspect, and reuse files across simulations. Clear metadata and file states helped users understand which inputs were ready, incomplete, or already connected to a simulation.

Clear file states and metadata reduced uncertainty about which inputs were ready, incomplete, or already connected to a simulation.

03. Simulation Setup

Simulation setup involved multiple parameters and dependencies. I grouped related settings, introduced a clearer sequence, and surfaced validation before launch.

04. Simulation Management

Making simulation status and history easier to track
I designed a simulation list that helped researchers distinguish draft, queued, running, completed, and failed states without opening each item.

05. Parameter Mapping

I designed a visual mapping workspace that helped researchers understand relationships between datasets, parameters, and simulation outputs.
Selection states and contextual details allowed users to inspect complex connections without losing the broader structure.

06. Results Exploration

I designed a results workspace that brought simulated and experimental data into one view.
Researchers could customise visualisations, compare outputs, identify deviations, and understand how parameter changes affected results.

Design System & Delivery

Building a system for a growing technical product

I created reusable patterns for dense tables, file states, simulation statuses, parameter inputs, graphs, and system feedback.
The design system helped maintain consistency across complex workflows and provided the engineering team with reusable implementation patterns.

Results & Reflection

Results

A unified product structure

Files, simulations, statuses, graphs, and analysis tools were organised into one consistent workspace

Faster product development

Reusable components and interaction patterns supported new workflows without redesigning the interface from scratch.

External recognition

The project received recognition from the Vega Digital Awards and Summit International Awards.

Consistent delivery

Reusable patterns improved consistency across complex product areas and developer handoff.

Reflection

Designing Fusion Twin required learning enough about the scientific domain to simplify the workflow without removing the precision experts depended on.

Complex products do not always need less information. They need better structure, clearer relationships, and predictable states.

LinkedInBehanceInstagramMedium